Thursday, April 9, 2009

Internet freedom being curtailed in SOUTH Korea? UPDATED (9 Apr 2009)

UPDATE (9 April 2009 6:14pm Korea time) - The Korea Times reports that YouTube has rejected the Real Name system as previously described. Youtube "will allow users to view YouTube content but without being able to post videos or comments." - the two things that would require the Real Name system by Korean law. The story also reports that "South Korean users will likely be able to post videos on the site without difficulty if they set their country preference to countries other than South Korea." Just like I said - the technical abilities of virtually any internet user to click their mouse will overcome a stupid law and system. Now, if Korea really wants to play the cat-and-mouse game, they could try and force websites to track people back by the IP's they've been using. Oh, wait, that doesn't work either.

Internet 1, Korea 0.

UPDATE (30 March 2009 10:13pm Korea time) - the story finally made the Korea Times. Not sure what took them so long. In their story they mention the official - and unofficial - reasons:


KCC [Korean Communications Commission] officials explain that such measures were inevitable to curb "cyber bullying'' and reduce misinformation on the Internet. However, critics argue that the Lee Myung-bak government is getting overzealous in its efforts to monitor cyberspace, after being repeatedly attacked by bloggers, first over the controversial decision to resume U.S. beef imports, and more recently for its ineptitude in economic policies.

--

This is not satire.

--

Every now and then there's a story that doesn't make the Korea Times [see update above] or Korea Herald, two of Korea's largest English-language newspapers. Although there are plenty of news sources about Korea in English (the Chosun Ilbo being another excellent one), I have yet to see this story reported elsewhere. From the Hankyoreh (here's the article):


Google, the world’s largest Internet company, has finally submitted to South Korea‘s unprecedented Internet regulations, including agreeing to implement a “real name” system in which any South Korean can post their contents only after they confirm their resident registration number [somewhat like a social security number; emphasis mine].

The head offices of Google have explored various means of bypassing the “real-name registration system,” arguing that freedom of expression should be experienced globally by all users, including proposing to shut down YouTube services in South Korea but to no avail. A representative of Google Korea says that South Korea “is the first country worldwide [emphasis mine] for which Google will be collecting real-name information that can be used to identify individuals.”

The company plans to reorganize its site beginning April 1 so that subscribers in South Korea must confirm their real names before posting materials or replies on YouTube Korea. Concurrently April 1 is when the amendment to South Korea’s Act on the Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and User Protection will go into effect. It expands the scope of sites subject to the real name registration system to those that have at least 100,000 users per day.

Wow. Just. Wow. But wait, it gets better...

...The government had promised Google 1.2 billion won [about $892,000 USD] in research and development support upon entering South Korea’s market, and more through its online advertising. “It’s difficult to ignore South Korean Internet regulations while we‘re engaged in offering search services as well as engaged in online advertising,” lamented a Google Korea official....

Again, wow. So let me get this straight - the Korean government GAVE Google money for "research and development", then passes a law requiring you to use your real name (at least to post to YouTube) online? 'Freedom of speech'? Ha. It's a slippery slope down from there - one you wouldn't expect from a free and democratic country...

So what are Youtube-lovin' Koreans to do? The article makes it sounds like posting and commenting were the only things that requires one to use their real name. Viewing things won't be a problem. A technical solution would probably work (using a foreign proxy server and registering as though one lives in the US), but that might still be blocked if a Korean address were detected... I'm not sure how '1984'-ish this solution will be; as of this writing searching YouTube didn't show anything about the change. I really hope this is just a (NOT FUNNY) April Fools Day joke, and that someone will let the world know that Korea isn't turning into the land George Orwell wrote about.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised by the Korean government. After the Minerva incident (put simply, a popular blogger in Korea was arrested on charges of undermining the country's financial markets with his dire predictions) and the use of the internet to organize the mad cow protests from last summer (which paralyzed traffic in downtown Seoul more than once and drew crowds numbering in the tens of thousands), terms and concepts like 'free speech', and 'democracy' go out the window.

Other countries might accept North Korea and China has odd internet restrictions thanks to the nature of the Communist government, but one certainly doesn't expect the same from a country trying to pass itself as a democracy with free speech.

In some related news, a 'three-strikes-and-you're-out' law could be taking effect, wherein an ISP may cut off internet access if one is accused of sharing copyrighted files over the internet three times - with or without proof. The story, written about on another excellent Korea blog called the Marmot's Hole, is another piece of evidence in Korea's move to clamp down on piracy, something no country has yet to have success at. If you're serious about stamping out 'piracy', why not catch the guys OPENLY SELLING PIRATED DVD'S on the sidewalks or in the subway stations?

Sphere: Related Content

8 comments:

Joe in Korea said...

Freedom of speech as we know it in North America does not exist in Korea. The right to one's reputation supersedes the right to free speech.

If one says something that hurts your reputation, even if it is true, you can sue them. If you post a video that shows someone in a compromising position, someone will come after you.

Also, I believe this is why there is no good system of restaurant reviews here. If you eat some bad shrimp somewhere, you cannot say the name of the place online because you can be sued for damages to their reputation.

Like it or not, it's not going to change. This concept predates the internet age by generations and generations. Just like holding the whole family accountable for the mistakes of one, or even your descendants punished for your actions. These are all part of the Eastern way of looking at things.

Sure, proxies might help if you really want to post something scandalous, but is it worth it?

Jo-Anna said...

But, isn't this just mainly to prevent copyright infringement? I mean... we've all gotten so used to stealing copyrighted information off the internet that we forget it's illegal.. and... kind of immoral... since we're cutting into the profit of the people who put so much time into creating the product, whether it be TV, Music or whatever. From the government... and really... from a business viewpoint, doesn't this make sense?

Though.. I do agree with you about the street DVD sellers..

Chris in South Korea said...

@Joe: you're correct that reputation matters more than the truth in Korea. As it was explained to me, if one is sued for libel (wherein the usual defense in USA is the absolute truth), Korean courts tends to take the matter of reputation far more at hand. Your boss cheated you out of money and you blog about it? Yeah, you can guess what happens. It's not that I *would* post anything scandalous - but it's certainly a chilling effect. What happens when an American teacher tapes a Korean teacher beating the crap out of a student?

@Jo-Anna: I suspect it's one part copyright infringement (ha) and one part of the gradual censorship of the internet. The Korean government had never had to deal with people organizing en masse as they did for the beef protests last summer - and supposedly a lot of it happened on the internet. If you've ever used Facebook to organize a flash mob, it's basically the same thing albeit a much larger scale. If they TRULY wanted to crack down on copyright infringement, get rid of the whales (the biggest uploaders, DVD-cloning factories).

In the meantime, I've downgraded Korea's democratic status to 'generally free, except when the government wants you to be'.

Amanda said...

Generally free, except when the gov't wants... Sounds like the Patriot Act to me.

Jo-Anna said...

Haha... yea... I guess Korea is no worse than the US sometimes... But, yea, if it infringes on free speech, or the ability of citizens to organize, then boo to that... This is just one more thing to add on to Lee Myung Bak's bad reputation... I just read today in the Korea Times that the government is going to allow Lotte to build some ginormous building over by Jamsil that could block air traffic to a military air base. Their solution? Transfer certain planes to Wonju and move a runway 3˚. Why not just find a better location for this building????? (yea yea.. I know... everything Lotte is in Jamsil...). Or, heaven forbid you make the bulding a little shorter. Let's just hope that no planes hit it in the first rainstorm. -_-

Estudent said...

See? It was NOT just about the beef.

단군 said...

What a shame, huh...>_<...U guys living in Korea?...Geee, freedom of speech?...where is that? and what is it, more importantly?...and there are some interesting debates going ob among readers, let me have a look...
Joe in Korea/yes, man, u can talk about the bad restaurant but better think about writing it straight. Will u write about it if u discovered it is belonged to one of ur close Korean friend? Yes? O.K, go ahead and good luck. My point is that no body wants to make mistake intentionally except Mr. George W. Bush, right? So, why don't reconsider before u write about it?

Jo-Anna/street DVD sellers, come to Thailand, u'll know what I mean and may be u can go to Las Vega and u can nail on this issue.

Amanda/Patriot Act? Give me a break...>_<...The north americans, u people had a great time with Mr. Bush, right for almost 8 years and u people still call this "Patriot" for the people of North America and to the world?...U make me laugh, indeed.

Christ in Korea/Man, do u speak Korean? I hope that u do. In order to comprehend what these opressed Korean bloggers and civilians are upto is all about "history." Study about their media history in particuluar if only u have a heart for them. But, in general, I believe that u got the point in superficial...^^...make some more noise for the Korean bloggers, they need u people~

아만다 said...

단군, huh?